DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28908>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28908 Oracle.sql incorrect ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-11 22:40 ------- Diff's can be hard to read, but is this basically changing all 'int' columns to INTEGER(10) and BIGINTS to INTEGER(20)? If this is the case, then I would +1 this patch, in fact, I'd recommend the use of Integer over int/bigint any day, mainly because of some postgres weirdness that burnt me to a crisp one day. However the patch seems to have lots-o-white-space, so rather than apply the patch as such, should I apply your recommendation of changing the int/bigints to number? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
