> No one has commented on the idea of using sequential ids to > distinguish > between logging events.
I think this is an incredibly important feature, and one probably lacking in the internals of the LoggingEvent class at the moment too (irrespective of a unique id in the dB). Doesn't the JDK1.4 logging framework assign something of a 'unique' id to each event instance? Is this something we should consider for log4j, as this would add a fair bit of power to the aggregation of events from different sources. Not sure of any performance penalty though of having to generate an id with each LoggingEvent instance construction. cheers, Paul Smith --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
