DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28692>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28692 non-configured log4j defaults could be better ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-29 19:17 ------- I'm -1 on changing this: in the absence of explicit configuration, it's better to have more information than less, so the current default is best. Obviously there'll be scenarios where it's expensive and/or ill-fitting, but those people should explicitly configure log4j. The default config of a logging system should never hide/reject logging statements. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
