On Monday 06 December 2004 21:59, Shapira, Yoav wrote: > Hi, > We should balance the performance aspect versus the requirement for > serialization compatibility. I think the latter is a nice to have, but > by no means an essential feature. I think the former is imperative for > log4j as it is for any logging system. If we can get the serialization > compatibility without losing performance of the related classes, that's > cool.
Manuual serialization through readObject and writeObject, as well as the explicit serialVerUID is ALWAYS faster than the implicit handling in the serialization subsystem. Just slightly more work for the programmer. :o) Cheers Niclas -- +------//-------------------+ / http://www.dpml.net / / http://niclas.hedhman.org / +------//-------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
