On Tuesday 07 December 2004 05:23, Curt Arnold wrote: > I'm sure that you could do better with a custom wire-format than the > current Java default serialization, however I'm not sure that you would > see any significant advantage over custom serialization. The benefits > for using Java custom serialization would be a well defined wire > format, usage patterns and language support within log4j. I doubt that > it would make the implementation of log4net and log4cxx much harder > than any other protocol.
Well, Serialization is not dead-easy to deserialize in another language, and compared to a text/line based protocol it is outright difficult. :o) The concern, however, may be raised in to outset of a larger system with many different Log4J versions, with a single management system. Cheers Niclas -- +------//-------------------+ / http://www.dpml.net / / http://niclas.hedhman.org / +------//-------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
