Curt,
Just looked at the code. It answered my question regarding the setOption1, ..., setOptionN. Just use an aggregated data type instead of a simple one.
I propose the following clean up would make the code in PatternConverter simpler.
- Remove the setOption method
- Change PatternConverter.setOptions to be implemented as {}, i.e. NOP.
- Change sub-classes of PatternConverter dealing with options override the NOP implementaton in PatternConverter.setOptions.
OK?
-- Ceki G�lc�
The complete log4j manual: http://qos.ch/log4j/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
