I'm not sure if we are looking at the same run since the Gump message seemed to arrive about an hour after your message.

Looking at http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/logging-chainsaw/logging-log4j- chainsaw/gump_work/build_logging-chainsaw_logging-log4j-chainsaw.html

I added commons-vfs to the dependency list and it appears to show up in the classpath along with log4j. The messages aren't consistent with a missing log4j.jar since they say that TTCCLayout is deprecated. If log4j wasn't present, they would say that it could not be resolved. Before I added commons-vfs to the dependency, the build script gave a warning that it should be included. Now it says that VFS is present.

I downloaded the Gump log4j.jar and it does not contain SocketHubAppender.class. I don't know why, but will look at tomorrow. The unresolved getLogger() in the VFSLogFilePatternReceiver smells like a real issue. Prior to today the VFS related classes were being built by Gump since VFS wasn't in the dependency list.



On Feb 25, 2005, at 9:37 PM, Paul Smith wrote:

Ok. I've got the gump module out and now at least understand a bit more about gump.

The reason I think this failed is because the current Chainsaw build expects a set of jars to be available as part of the compile classpath. I see that the gump descriptor has logging-log4j and commons-vfs, but it is plain to see from below that these don't get added to the compile classpath.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to