Given that there was no vote on log4j 1.2.10 and significant issues worthy of discussion, I felt that is was essential that there be some disclaimer so that unsuspecting visitors to the log4j web site would not download a supposed production release that does not have the endorsement of the PMC. Text is:
Disclaimer: This release was posted without a required vote and may be withdrawn.
In my previous message, I had attempted to describe one mechanism that an SLF4J facade over log4j could offer comparable performance to a direct implementation of SLF4J within log4j. There are likely other approaches that could also work and the one I outlined may not be the best. The intent was not to start a discussion on how write a performant facade, but that there was the potential for a performant facade so committing to a direct implementation in a production release was premature.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
