Only that Paul said he was looking for someone to say what needed to be done, and that was a task I thought of. But if you can get it done sooner, go for it. Work it out with Paul.
I plan to organize the tasks for the 1.3 release soon, so there will be more that falls out of that as well. -Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 12:36 PM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Overview Proposal 2 > > > On May 17, 2005, at 10:59 AM, Mark Womack wrote: > > > > > So, Paul, you are +1 on the overall proposal? Hashing out the > > specific bug > > fixes for 1.2.12 is a TBD. I was not suggesting that these > > specific fixes > > had to go in as part of the proposal. Appreciate the quick review. > > > > And, of course, when you get a chance to do the jDiff report, that > > will be > > great. It will be cool if we can post the generated docs to the > > website as > > well. That will really help in communicating the upcoming changes and > > differences. > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > Is there a specific reason that Paul is assigned to do the jDiff > report (i.e. previous involvement with jDiff, etc)? I've got a high > priority task at the moment, but expect I could get it done today or > tomorrow. > > I was thinking that it might be better to add it to our Gump build so > that it is built nightly and could be downloaded from there. Placing > it on the web site might be more appropriate for the diffs for > released versions. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
