> -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Deboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 6:31 PM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: RE: [VOTE] slf4j support in log4j 1.2.X > > I won't have time to help on this, so if others feel it's important, go > ahead, but since the fork exists, folks who are interested in using slf4j > with log4j 1.2.x already have a way to do that.
I agree, but I think that deciding overall goals and direction for/with those wanting to do the work is still important. If we had this discussion before we would have avoided the whole 1.2.10 release. > One other issue to consider is that how we choose to integrate slf4j into > 1.2.x (if we do) may be different from how we integrate slf4j into 1.3 > (the issue needs to be researched further). Agreed. The current cvs can be more flexible or different that whatever is done for a 1.2 release. > I'd prefer we focus on finishing up the minor changes that have been > discussed re: 1.2.x (trace, etc.), but leave slf4j integration as a 1.3 > issue. Ceki may choose to integrate any changes we make to 1.2.x to his > fork, and that's fine with me. Agreed. We should focus on the releases we have decided to do. Working on slf4j until it is deemed "frozen" is a parallel effort. I'd like to support slf4j more concretely with an actual release in the 1.2 code base. Then adding it to an "official" release is a different decision. -Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
