On Jan 9, 2006, at 10:29 AM, Elias Ross wrote:
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 22:22 -0600, Curt Arnold wrote:
I haven't taken a serious look at the code. But if all the IP issues
are addressed and there are no objections, I'd have no problem having
the contribution in the sandbox. If it then progresses to something
that the community wants in a formal log4j release, then all it would
take is a "svn mv" or two to graft in into the log4j source tree.
Hi Curt Arnold and Log4j List,
Now that I'm back...
So, how might I address the IP concerns and release this into "svn"?
Please address me privately, if necessary.
I think that the scope of the contribution is substantial enough that
having a signed Contributor License Agreement (see http://
www.apache.org/licenses/) should be on file. The CLA contains
representations that you have rights to contribute the code, etc.
After that is on file, then resubmit the contribution attached to a
bug report (since the CLA would not be retroactive to previous
submissions).
I also have a list of miscellaneous fixes that "findbugs" (of
http://findbugs.sf.net"; located. (Mostly unused variables and other
cleanup items.) It may be helpful to integrate this tool into the
build
as well.
The experimental Maven build currently builds a PMD (http://
pmd.sourceforge.net) report which may have some functional overlap
with Findbugs. There did seem to be a Findbugs Maven plugin, but I
haven't investigated whether it was a Maven 1.x or Maven 2.x plugin.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
