Part of the equation is also the web application servers like JBoss, etc. They are all on 1.5/5 now, but they weren't for a while there.
-Mark On 2/23/06, Jess Holle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The real question is how many people will not upgrade to the latest > stable JVM yet want to upgrade to the latest (currently unstable) log4j. > > By the time log4j 1.3 is released, I'm guessing Java 6 will be stable, > making the question "how many won't upgrade to at least the version > prior to latest yet want the latest log4j?" > > Boris Unckel wrote: > > Jess Holle wrote: > >> I'm sure I'm in the minority here, but 1.2.13 seems fine for "legacy" > >> versions of Java, i.e. everything prior to Java 5. > >> > >> I'd be fine with requiring Java 5 for log4j 1.3 and using the best > >> concurrency, etc, utilities it has to offer. > > Does Java5 have this market share? For technical reasons I would > > prefer always the latest stable version, but for a user > > base mainly working with one release before... > > > > Regards > > Boris > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
