For those not willing or able to move past JDK1.3, it seems like they'd also be unlikely to keep up with the latest versions of supporting libraries such as Log4j. Since the 1.2.xx branch will always be there and still works just fine, I don't see any problem with moving to JDK1.4, as long as application code that had used 1.2.xx continues to work with 1.3.xx when the user makes the move to JDK1.4+. A 2.xx release should definitely move to 1.5 after that, as long as there's a compelling reason to do so.
Jake At 09:28 AM 2/23/2006 -0800, you wrote: >We have talked about this before, and I plan to poll the user list, >but I thought we could talk about it some more here first. > >What base JDK version do we want to support for log4j 1.3? > JDK 1.2? > > JDK 1.3? > >Cons: >- not as universal of an option for logging > >Pros: >- can use more modern, builtin classes (like Scheduler) instead of >growing our own >- less testing and build maintenance > >others? > >comments? >-Mark > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
