Apologise for the delay in repyling to this
On 24/02/2006, at 4:15 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
On Feb 23, 2006, at 8:49 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
Well, I've committed the last doco bits and pieces for ZeroConf
and Chainsaw, and wouldn't mind a release to get some feedback.
Anyway, I'm obviously +1. If Scott +1's it, is that enough
votes.. ? Do we need a broader vote? We haven't had a vote in
the past, but maybe that's because no-one, including me, ever
thought about it.
cheers,
Paul
Given the feedback on the recent log4j 1.3 alpha 8, how would you
characterize the intended release? It production quality to be
placed on the primary dist and mirrors or alpha, beta or otherwise
and placed on cvs.apache.org?
Chainsaw is still alpha, so this release is just like all the others
we've done, it's an "early access release".
What versions of log4j would it work with?
It currently ships with alpha 7. however I do local testing against
HEAD all the time to make sure it still works. Once alpha 8 is
released, i'll switch to using that for distribution type releases.
Would you prefer Mark to do a build and place it for review or do
you intend to do that? A release vote would need a set of bits for
us to give thumbs up or down.
Sorry not to be up on these things.
I have all the ant bits and pieces setup so that "ant distribution"
in the log4j-chainsaw module will build, package, and ship (via scp)
to the current spot to be deployed. I think just need to move aside
the old distribition and replace it with the new version.
Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
