DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39023>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39023 Summary: o.a.l.RollingFileAppender, DailyRollingFileAppender and ExternallyRFA not compatible Product: Log4j Version: 1.3alpha Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Appender AssignedTo: [email protected] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The SVN HEAD currently contains facades that mimic the configuration behavior of the log4j 1.2 RollingFileAppenders but delegate to o.a.l.rolling.RFA for implementation. These, while better than nothing, are not compatible with existing RFA extensions and there is likely no way to remain compatible without migrating the log4j 1.2 implementations forward. Based on the volume of traffic on RFA's on the mailing list, extending the RFA's appear to be a common practice. Not supporting existing extensions in a 1.3 release is unacceptible in my opinion. However, the ported RFA's should be marked as deprecated. The ported RFA's could also be isolated in a log4j-obsolete.jar with other files that have been superceded and should not be used in new code. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
