DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34759>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34759 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-14 14:34 ------- An abstract member in a public class can not be deleted and replaced with a different signature without breaking source and binary compatibility. With the patch dated 2005-05-05, any user provided PatternConverter would fail (I'm guessing with a NoSuchMethodException). There are also public members removed from classes which also would break compatibility, but with likely less drastic affects. The existing signature is ugly, but it can't simply be changed in a 1.2 or 1.3 release. I'm marking as NEEDINFO in case you want to resubmit a patch that addresses the issue without breaking compatibility, but should eventually be closed if no patch is submitted. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
