+1 Is there a convention describing an abandoned branch?
Scott Deboy -----Original Message----- From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:32 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Rename log4j trunk? Log4j/trunk is no longer the main development branch. Renaming it log4j/branches/v1_3-branch would eliminate mistaking it for the latest and greatest. It may disrupt someone (we'd address gump as part of the change), but I think they'd eventually have to deal with it. I'm not sure if we should have trunk be a link to 1.2 or abandon it until 2.0 is viable. Thought? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
