Curt Arnold wrote:
On Jun 19, 2008, at 8:41 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
I'm also happy to see you'd like to change the configuration. I'd
actually like to make that pluggable, but I guess I'd also be happy
using something like commons-logging, as long as their aren't any
circularity conflicts.
Internal logging should be less significant in log4j 2.0 since lower
level stuff should be reporting problems with exceptions instead of
quietly swallowing them. Where internal logging becomes necessary, I'd
lean toward OSGi's logging facility, however I think it is a long way
off before figuring that out.
Sorry. Fingers didn't type what the mind was thinking. I meant
commons-configuration, not commons-logging. commons-logging makes no
sense in the context of pluggable configuration.
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
