https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42023
--- Comment #3 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-03 03:11:56 PST --- I don't think that an "old" SocketAppender and a "new" SocketReciver can talk together with your patch. I think it would be better to create a super class of LoggingEvent which has the serializable field, and then create a SocketAppenderIncludingLoggingEvent (or something) appender which does the necessary voodoo as it will be backward compatible. Could you elaborate on the circumstances where this missing field is an issue when deserialized? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
