On 15.02.2010 14:28, Curt Arnold wrote: > I reverted the "prudent" mode patch in rev 910151. Working with the > hat of "release manager", it seemed to be prudent not to delay 1.2.16 > by including a contested code fragment. The reversion should not be > interpreted as anything else.
It doesn't look like you are having any regrets about your inappropriate actions. As I tried to explain, you cannot look at some code, copy it almost verbatim and then claim it as your own original creation. It's called copyright infringement. The document Ralph mentioned is quite helpful in this regard: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement -- Ceki Gülcü --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
