Den 14/05/10 09.22, Ralph Goers skrev:
2. I don't like the way Logback binds to the implementation. I used a technique
I had used in a previous logging framework and used a file to define the
implementation class. In theory, the API could be modified to support multiple
logging implementation simultaneously, although I have no plans to implement
that.
You mean slf4j binding to logback?
I think the work done with standardizing the Seam approach in JEE 6
(which I am reading up on) will benefit also slf4j, since it will
basically handle the API->implementation binding, so that the logging
framework will not have to.
7, All internal components use the logger API for status reporting. A specific
StatusLogger provides the implementation.
I like that. It is nice that you can use logging even if you are coding
stuff inside a logger.
--
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen "...plus... Tubular Bells!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
