We still need one +1. Anybody out there who can help?

This vote is already open for 18 days. I suggest that we leave it open
until Monday morning. If nobody can help, we must consider cancelling
this release and improve the build system before the next one.

That being said, Ralph and I could build log4j 1 successfully. Maybe
the remaining voter might consider to just check the formal stuff to
give his +1, like licenses, sigs etc. I know that usually running mvn
test is part of a good re-check, but in this case maybe it is OK to
rely on Ralph and my test.

Lastly, I have made a VirtualBox image to build log4j. Due to its size
it is not possible for me to upload it somewhere (not enough webspace
and a pretty slow connection). But I offer anyone from the
Logging-team to send a DVD with the burned image via postal service.

Thanks!
Christian


On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Ralph Goers
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, this build is a bit odd. However, I was able to build it on my Mac 
> successfully and I don't see any issues with it so
>
> +1
>
> Ralph
>
> On May 12, 2012, at 5:37 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Fellows, any ideas what we can do now?
>> 6 days past and we have no vote (except my implicit one).
>> We now know we need to improve our build. But I really would like to
>> start with that after 1.2.17
>>
>> Suggestion: please let me know if you have a chance to vote or not. I
>> will gladly wait for another while, but if it is definitely not
>> possible, we need to see if we can cancel this vote and instead
>> working towards an improved build.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Curt Arnold <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On May 7, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All:
>>>>
>>>> Because I could not get the full build to run on Windows 7 with Maven 2 or 
>>>> 3. I feel reluctant to VOTE +1 here. This is a know issue due to the use 
>>>> the GNU app Winres. I get bits and pieces of the build to work but nothing 
>>>> like the level of confidence I have running Commons builds for different 
>>>> components. I can build the site (with the Maven stack trace noted in 
>>>> other RC votes), I can run the tests. The changes seems OK, but... as a 
>>>> new committer here I need to learn the code some more.
>>>>
>>>> Is the only way to get this to build is to install VirtualBox and a Linux 
>>>> distro?
>>>
>>> A cloud provider (Amazon Web Services, for example), a bootable USB or CD 
>>> would be another. A cloud provider could be problematic since you would not 
>>> want to have your code signing key on a machine you don't control.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I will note the following nits though:
>>>>
>>>> The build instructions use both version 1.2.16 and 1.2.17 in text and 
>>>> examples, see 
>>>> "http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/trunk/docs/log4j/1.2/building.html
>>>>
>>>> This is not critical but should be fixed in SVN. I would like to see 
>>>> version agnostic instructions or use the latest version (the one being 
>>>> built).
>>>>
>>>> I see this warning from M3 and M2:
>>>>
>>>> prepare:
>>>> [available] DEPRECATED - <available> used to override an existing property.
>>>> [available] Build file should not reuse the same property name for 
>>>> different values.
>>>>
>>>> Not a showstopper but should be addressed or documented in SVN.
>>>
>>> I haven't followed Ant for a long time. Ant properties since time began 
>>> have been immutable once set. it was once acceptable style to take 
>>> advantage of this documented behavior and, for example, set properties to a 
>>> default value that would be ignored if the called provided an explicit 
>>> value. Apparently, that fell out of style and hence this warning. I think 
>>> the Nant didn't follow that lead and lots of confusion ensued.
>>>
>>> I can't hit the 72 hour mark, but can try to review and build within 24 
>>> hours.
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to