[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13571694#comment-13571694
]
Joanne Polsky edited comment on LOG4J2-160 at 2/5/13 8:35 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve attached the first patch for review; LOG4J2-160-1.patch. I'd like to
split this change into 2 changes lists if possible to reduce complexity. The
first being the change to include the new separator option and apply it to the
pattern converters. The second would address the performance improvements for
ExtendedThrowablePatternConverter and RootThrowablePatternConverter in
ThrowableProxy; there are some additional complexities that I would like to
discuss outside of the context of this initial change.
I’ve created a new class called ThrowableFormatOptions which contains the
parsing logic for the %throwable, %xThrowable and %rThrowable patterns. Each
will support a new option to have a custom stack trace separator, for instance:
%ex{full}{separator(|)}
%ex{separator(|)}
This works fine for ThrowablePatternConverter, however, for
ExtendedThrowablePatternConverter/RootThrowablePatternConverter there seems to
be inconsistency between how options are delimited. From the user guide
(http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-users-guide.pdf), these patterns can
use a comma delimiter:
%rEx["none"|"short"|"full"|depth],[filters(packages)}
However, this doesn't seem consistent with the way other patterns delimit the
options by enclosing them in braces { }, for instance the following seems more
correct:
%rEx[{("none"|"short"|"full"|depth)}][{filters(packages)}]
I copied the existing code to support the case where 2 options are used
{full,filters_or_separator), but I didn't add support for the case where all 3
options are used {full,filters,separator}. It complicates parsing considerably
since filters uses commas to delimit the packages as well. It requires these
classes to use custom parsing techniques that are outside the standard
framework which doesn't feel natural. Is is possible to change the recommended
usage in the user guide to use the standard delimiters instead? Since this is
still considered beta, is it acceptable to drop the comma syntax in favor of
the braces exclusively?
was (Author: jpolsky):
I’ve attached the first patch for review; LOG4J2-160-1.patch. I'd like to
split this change into 2 changes lists if possible to reduce complexity. The
first being the change to include the new separator option and apply it to the
pattern converters. The second would address the performance improvements for
ExtendedThrowablePatternConverter and RootThrowablePatternConverter in
ThrowableProxy; there are some additional complexities that I would like to
discuss outside of the context of this initial change.
I’ve created a new class called ThrowableFormatOptions which contains the
parsing logic for the %throwable, %xThrowable and %rThrowable patterns. Each
will support a new option to have a custom stack trace separator, for instance:
%ex{full}{separator(|)}
%ex{separator(|)}
This works fine for ThrowablePatternConverter, however, for
ExtendedThrowablePatternConverter/RootThrowablePatternConverter there seems to
be inconsistency between how options are delimited. From the user guide
(http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-users-guide.pdf), these patterns can
use a comma delimiter:
%rEx["none"|"short"|"full"|depth],[filters(packages)}
However, this doesn't seem consistent with the way other patterns delimit the
options by enclosing them in braces { }, for instance the following seems more
correct:
%rEx[{("none"|"short"|"full"|depth)}][{filters(packages)}]
I copied the existing code to support the case where 2 options are used
{full,filters_or_separator), but I didn't add support for the case where all 3
options are used {full,filters,separator}. It complicates parsing considerably
since filters uses commas to delimit the packages and requires these classes to
use custom parsing techniques that are outside the standard framework. Is is
possible to change the recommended usage in the user guide to use the standard
delimiters instead? Since this is still considered beta, is it acceptable to
drop the comma syntax in favor of the braces exclusively?
> Include option in throwable pattern converter to control stack trace separator
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-160
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-160
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Joanne Polsky
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: LOG4J2-160-1.patch
>
>
> Copying feature request from Bugzilla 1.x:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51122
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
