There already existed an o.a.l.log4j.core.appender.db package that was empty. I discovered that I could create a base AbstractDatabaseAppender that took care of some operations common to JDBC, JPA /and/ NoSQL appenders. That led me to use the existing db package as follows:
db/
common DB appender classes
jdbc/
JDBC appender classes
jpa/
JPA appender classes
nosql/
NoSQL appender classes
I think that package structure makes a lot of sense. I'm open to convincing
arguments otherwise.
Nick
On Apr 27, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I think we should keep the packaging simpler: o.a.l.log4j.core.appender.jpa
>
> Gary
>
> On Apr 27, 2013, at 10:15, Nick Williams <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> o.a.l.log4j.core.appender.db.jpa
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
