[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13739604#comment-13739604
 ] 

Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-336:
------------------------------------

Andre, one reason I can see is that it is possible to create a configuration 
without a root element. In that case a default root element is created 
automatically (with a console Appender, ERROR level and a default layout). In 
this scenario the root logger is not part of the loggers Map.

As far as I can tell, the root logger would be part of the loggers Map if a 
{{<root>}} (or {{<asyncRoot>}}) logger is configured in the configuration file.
                
> AsyncLogger.log fail with NullPointerException after double reconfigure
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-336
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-336
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.0-beta8
>         Environment: LUbuntu 13.04, OpenJDK 7
>            Reporter: Andre Bogus
>            Assignee: Remko Popma
>             Fix For: 2.0-beta9
>
>
> Using reconfigure() to select log files at runtime.
> After the second reconfigure, the next log fails with a NullPointerException 
> in {{org.apache.logging.log4j.core.async.AsyncLoggerConfigHelper:253}}
> It appears that the disruptor has been nulled and not been brought back up by 
> the second {{reconfigure()}}.
> Trying to get a minimal test case I came up with the following log4j2.xml:
> {code}
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
> <configuration status="debug">
>   <appenders>
>     <Console name="console" target="SYSTEM_OUT">
>       <PatternLayout pattern="%d\{ABSOLUTE\} %6p %c %x - %m%n"/>
>     </Console>
>   </appenders>
>   <loggers>
>     <asyncroot level="WARN">
>       <appender-ref ref="console" />
>     </asyncroot>
>   </loggers>
> </configuration>
> {code}
> The following Java class did NOT bring up the error, instead it threw a 
> different exception (stack trace below):
> {code}
> import org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager;
> import org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger;
> import org.apache.logging.log4j.core.LoggerContext;
> public class Log4jAsyncReconfTest {
>     private static final Logger log = 
> LogManager.getLogger(Log4jAsyncReconfTest.class);
>     public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
>         System.out.println("test");
>         LoggerContext ctx = (LoggerContext) LogManager.getContext(false);
>         ctx.reconfigure();
>         ctx.reconfigure();
>         log.warn("Danger!");
>     }
> }
> {code}
> ----
> throws:
> java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException: Task 
> com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor@7ea4461e rejected from 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor@52f79c86[Terminated, pool size = 0, 
> active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 1]
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$AbortPolicy.rejectedExecution(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:2048)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.reject(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:821)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.execute(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1372)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$DelegatedExecutorService.execute(Executors.java:628)
>       at 
> com.lmax.disruptor.dsl.EventProcessorInfo.start(EventProcessorInfo.java:77)
>       at com.lmax.disruptor.dsl.Disruptor.start(Disruptor.java:263)
>       at 
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.async.AsyncLoggerConfigHelper.initDisruptor(AsyncLoggerConfigHelper.java:119)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to