That doesn't seem like sufficient justification to use explicit boxing. Autoboxing was added to the JLS for a reason. If you find code that's confusing, analyze it and comment it, maybe. But I disagree with switching from autoboxing to explicit boxing.
Not to mention that my IDE flags explicit boxing as a warning. N On Aug 22, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> > wrote: > Why? > > Because then the reader knows it is being done on purpose. I've fixed some > code today where it looks like unboxing and boxing happened back and forth > wastefully. For example, a class was using an Integer instead of an int and > conversions took place back and forth. In another case, a string was parsed > to an Integer only to be immediately unboxed; same for another call site but > for a Long, and so on. > > Gary > > On Aug 22, 2013, at 9:06 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > Author: ggregory > > Date: Thu Aug 22 16:06:08 2013 > > New Revision: 1516496 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1516496 > > Log: > > Make boxing and unboxing explicit. > > > > Modified: > > > > logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/rewrite/PropertiesRewritePolicy.java > > > > Modified: > > logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/rewrite/PropertiesRewritePolicy.java > > URL: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/rewrite/PropertiesRewritePolicy.java?rev=1516496&r1=1516495&r2=1516496&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > > --- > > logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/rewrite/PropertiesRewritePolicy.java > > (original) > > +++ > > logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/rewrite/PropertiesRewritePolicy.java > > Thu Aug 22 16:06:08 2013 > > @@ -49,9 +49,9 @@ public final class PropertiesRewritePoli > > private PropertiesRewritePolicy(final Configuration config, final > > List<Property> props) { > > this.config = config; > > this.properties = new HashMap<Property, Boolean>(props.size()); > > - for (final Property prop : props) { > > - final boolean interpolate = prop.getValue().contains("${"); > > - properties.put(prop, interpolate); > > + for (final Property property : props) { > > + final Boolean interpolate = > > Boolean.valueOf(property.getValue().contains("${")); > > + properties.put(property, interpolate); > > } > > } > > > > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ public final class PropertiesRewritePoli > > final Map<String, String> props = new HashMap<String, > > String>(source.getContextMap()); > > for (final Map.Entry<Property, Boolean> entry : > > properties.entrySet()) { > > final Property prop = entry.getKey(); > > - props.put(prop.getName(), entry.getValue() ? > > + props.put(prop.getName(), entry.getValue().booleanValue() ? > > config.getStrSubstitutor().replace(prop.getValue()) : > > prop.getValue()); > > } > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
