See this thread: http://log4j.markmail.org/thread/23z6w6m6sbwipwff
Particularly this message in the thread: http://log4j.markmail.org/thread/23z6w6m6sbwipwff#query:+page:1+mid:uomsjxd6m6zzqkox+state:results And this message: http://log4j.markmail.org/thread/23z6w6m6sbwipwff#query:+page:1+mid:mxqwrtvvoi5zfb6f+state:results N On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Actually, it looks like both 1.9 and 2.2 versions are used in different parts > of the POM... I 'm not sure why... > > Gary > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All: > > Can we have a comment in the main POM as to why we are using an old version > of Jackson (1.9) instead of the current version (2.x)? > > Thank you, > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
