private@logging. I can't imagine holding committer discussions on members@
Ralph On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:05 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Do you mean members@ or a log4j private list? > > G > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> > wrote: > I prefer holding the discussions on the private list but voting on the public > list. Just my preference though. > > Ralph > > On Sep 11, 2013, at 9:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Which ML should we discuss possible committer candidates? >> >> G >> >> -- >> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >> Spring Batch in Action >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
