Sorry. I got confused and thought you were talking about a vote on the thread for release. ;-)
Nick On Jan 2, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Nick Williams <[email protected]> > wrote: > Not yet. There are several outstanding issues regarding the web configuration > that need to be solved. I plan on tackling them next week. I'm finally > finishing my book this weekend—four months late. :-( > > Nick > > > I'm talking about a vote for the logo (the subject of this thread ;) > > Gary > > On Jan 2, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> So, should we call for a vote? >> >> Gary >> >> >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: Paul Benedict >> Date:01/02/2014 11:49 (GMT-05:00) >> To: Log4J Developers List >> Subject: Re: Logo Contest >> >> I think holding up the final release for the logo shouldn't be too desired. >> I am patiently waiting for 2.0 to hit GA and the logo is superfluous to my >> usage. >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> There have been many candidates submitted in the Logo contest [1] which can >> be viewed at http://www.fdmhosting.com/log4j2/. I am going to be honest and >> say that none of them grabs me and says “that’s the one”, although I like >> the ideas expressed in quite a few of them. I definitely like the play on >> version 2 and using it as a superscript to make it appear as log4j squared. >> Many of the logos just feel too big to me - they have Log4j adjacent to the >> image, making them take up a lot of horizontal space. On the images >> themselves, I really like the coffee cup submitted by Murad, I like the >> script used by Andreas but I would prefer that the 4 was facing the correct >> direction and that the 2 superscript be to the right of the 4 instead of to >> the left. I think many of the graphics submitted by Gary are kind of cool - >> they are very modern looking. >> >> Ideally we should pick out a new logo before 2.0 is released so it would be >> great if we could get more discussion on this. >> >> Finally, these are just my opinions. I won’t be the only one voting so I >> would definitely like to hear what some of the other PMC members think. >> >> Ralph >> >> >> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-316 >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Paul > > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
