Okay, I see now. I got confused by what Gary said: > That's brilliant! The Logger interface contains methods like log(Level, ...) > and StandardLogger extends Logger to provide info(), warn() and so on. > > This let's me create a custom Logger (DEFCON example) AND an extension to > StandardLogger with refined levels (NOTICE, DIAG, VERBOSE).
Nick On Jan 27, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > On Jan 27, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> > wrote: >> However, what I WOULD be okay with is creating a SimpleLogger interface for >> things like log(Level, ...), etc. and having Logger extend SimpleLogger to >> provide info(), warn(), and so on. This would be backwards compatible and >> abide by industry norms. >> > > This is what I was recommending. Sorry for any confusion. > > Paul
