I had thought it would be 2.0. Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 2, 2014, at 8:59 PM, Nick Williams <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'm finalizing the logging chapter of my book to send to the printers > Wednesday (I'm so glad I got to correct it to say Level was extendable!), and > I need to know what the Maven artifact GA version number will be. I print the > new Maven artifacts used in each chapter on the first page of the chapter as > a guide to the user. Log4j is the only library I'm using that isn't yet GA. I > want to be sure the version numbers I'm printing are correct. > > Here are the options that I can think of for the GA release: > > 2.0 > 2.0-GA > 2.0.GA > 2.0.Final > 2.0.RELEASE > 2.0.0 > 2.0.0-GA > 2.0.0.GA > 2.0.0.Final > 2.0.0.RELEASE > > So, which is it going to be? I assume that eventually we're going to have a > 2.0.1, 2.0.2, etc., so it would seem to me that, whatever GA is, it should > start with 2.0.0. Doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to go from 2.0 to > 2.0.1. However, all of our beta releases have been 2.0-Betan. > > Thoughts? > > Nick > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
