On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Nick Williams <[email protected] > wrote:
> Ahh. The class was originally abstract, hence why the methods were final. > I see now why that's not needed. My bad. > > N > > Yeah, lots of changes in this area. Good thing we're cutting a non-GA :) Gary > On Feb 9, 2014, at 12:34 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Nick Williams < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Gary, >> >> One of your commits tonight changed all of the methods in Level from >> being final to being non-final. > > > Uh, the class is final, hence all the method are final... > > Gary > > >> This is not what we agreed upon. Why did you make this change? Was this >> one of the auto-refactor changes? I've noticed a lot of cleanup tonight >> that smells like that. :-) >> >> Nick >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second > Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
