The benefit of not having all of these OSGi modules is that it makes Log4J "lighter" and more approachable.
Gary On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote: > Resist splitting things up unless there's a clear distinguishing benefit. > > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Today some people want to slice and dice log4j 2 into ever finer OSGI >> bundles. Tomorrow, people will want to do the same with whatever Oracle >> comes up with in project Jigsaw. Some people don't care for OSGi support. >> >> This is bound to be a big mess. >> >> Therefore I'd like to propose to split off OSGi and later Jigsaw into a >> separate project(s). This way people who care about OSGi can do all that >> they need without polluting the main log4j project with dozens of Maven >> modules. >> >> Thoughts? >> Gary >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Paul > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
