<sigh>

Now the build is failing in the taglib project due to a missing MANIFEST.MF, 
which I find unusual because the jar plugin normally creates that.

Ralph

On Apr 26, 2014, at 10:51 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:

> FileOutputTest was failing because the status level was changed to OFF and 
> the test is expecting status logs to be written to a file.  I’m not sure how 
> why this commit was ever done since a “mvn clean install” would have failed.  
> Let me reiterate one more time.  If the unit tests fail don’t commit - you 
> did something wrong as the unit tests should ALWAYS pass.
> 
> Ralph
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 26, 2014, at 10:30 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> The error in CustomConfigurationTest is now fixed. On to FileOutputTest.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>> On Apr 26, 2014, at 10:23 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> I finally got a chance to look at CustomConfigurationTest.  As I suspected 
>>> the unit test is incorrect.  
>>> 
>>> A check was added to see if the StatusLogger’s level was changed to info.  
>>> However, setting status=“info” doesn’t change the level of the Logger 
>>> attached to the status logger. It changes the Level associated with the 
>>> ConsoleListener added by the configuration.  So this error has nothing to 
>>> do with LOG4J2-607.
>>> 
>>> I should have a fix committed in a little bit.
>>> 
>>> Ralph
>>> 
>>> On Apr 21, 2014, at 12:03 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The first unit test failure there is due to LOG4J2-607. The second: not 
>>>> sure.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 21 April 2014 00:05, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> I just did a fresh checkout and am getting the following test failures:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Results :
>>>> 
>>>> Failed tests: 
>>>>   CustomConfigurationTest.testConfig:61 expected same:<ERROR> was 
>>>> not:<INFO>
>>>>   FileOutputTest.testConfig:44 File is empty
>>>> 
>>>> Tests run: 543, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 15
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to