So what about generating or receiving XML log events? Gary said something
about using Jackson for that, but I'm not sure on the specifics. It sounded
like something like an optional plugin based on the presence of Jackson.
Considering we use Jackson for JSON/YAML configuration formats, it would
make sense to keep anything depending on it in log4j-core.


On 14 May 2014 13:16, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:

> I would hope it would only be required for XMLLayout, JSONLayout and
> JSONConfiguration + any receivers you created.  Log4j with only XML
> configuration shouldn’t require Jackson. If it does it should be addressed.
>
> Ralph
>
> On May 14, 2014, at 9:09 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well, sure for JPA you need the API and a provider. What I am curious
> about is if we can start log4j without Jackson...
>
> Gary
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Mikael Ståldal
> Date:05/14/2014 07:37 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: Re: Dependency to javax.persistence
>
> I guess that a standalone app will not work with javax.persistence API
> only, it needs an implementation of it as well. And that implementation
> will most likely bring in the API as well.
>
> The JMS API dependecy is already declared as provided, from
> log4j-core/pom.xml:
>
>     <!-- Used for JMS appenders (needs an implementation of course) -->
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>org.jboss.spec.javax.jms</groupId>
>       <artifactId>jboss-jms-api_1.1_spec</artifactId>
>       <scope>provided</scope>
>     </dependency>
>
>     <!-- Used for JPA appenders (needs an implementation of course) -->
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>org.eclipse.persistence</groupId>
>       <artifactId>javax.persistence</artifactId>
>       <scope>compile</scope>
>       <optional>true</optional>
>     </dependency>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Why? How would that bring in the right jar in a standalone app? Are you
>> assuming the app lives in a container like a J2EE server?
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Mikael Ståldal
>> Date:05/14/2014 04:01 (GMT-05:00)
>> To: log4j-dev@logging.apache.org
>> Subject: Dependency to javax.persistence
>>
>> Can't the dependency to javax.persistence be declared as provided?
>>
>> --
>> Mikael Ståldal
>> Chief Software Architect
>> *Appear*
>> Phone: +46 8 545 91 572
>> Email: mikael.stal...@appearnetworks.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Mikael Ståldal
> Chief Software Architect
> *Appear*
> Phone: +46 8 545 91 572
> Email: mikael.stal...@appearnetworks.com
>
>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to