Gary, Good catch!
I'm still thinking it may be easier if ThreadContext.ContextStack does not extend Collection (it adds quite a few methods). Perhaps the client code could use the existing asList method? (I don't have a strong opinion on this, just thought it could save you some work...) Sent from my iPhone > On 2014/05/19, at 10:27, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > FYI: > > I plan on replacing org.apache.logging.log4j.ThreadContext.EMPTY_STACK with > an object that is in fact immutable, in the style of Collections.emptyList(). > > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
