I vote for setFoo()
Cheers, Paul On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16 June 2014 10:11, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Curious: how long do you think it would take you to convert all plugins? >> > > Longer than I'd like to wait for 2.0 to be released, but in the grand > scheme of things, I think I could probably crank it out over like six > weekends. Maybe less. I can generate builder classes via my IDE by simply > specifying all the fields first and then generating fluent setters. The > only thing I'd like clarified is naming schemes: foo() vs setFoo() vs > withFoo() vs some other pattern. I'd prefer the first one, but the second > one at least makes the method names consistent with the setter naming > pattern. >
