We should probably add the appropriate pom element to enforce that as well.
On 26 June 2014 17:59, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > No objections to supporting only maven 3. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2014/06/27, at 7:47, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 to Maven 3 only. I do not see the point in jumping through hoops on > this one. > > Gary > > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> LOG4J2-692 reports that the build fails due to the new support for the >> Maven shade plugin. Frankly I haven’t used Maven 2 in years and I’m not >> sure why we list it as supported. I would propose fixing this with a doc >> change to say we require Maven 3. >> >> Any objections? >> >> Ralph >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
