Yeah, I would second that. I'm working on some simple wrapper classes for JNDI so that Android will be able to use JNDI if desired by repackaging the JNDI classes and specifying a log4j property for what class to use instead of javax.naming.InitialContext. As a bonus, this wrapper implements Closeable, so the close() method will work as the normal ones should.
On 19 July 2014 16:46, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not looking too closely at commits flying by now. I see a lot of doc > changes -- good -- but also some other stuff from Matt just now, not sure > if that is bug fixish or new featurish. Can we all agree to cut 2.0.1 soon? > I'd like to see 2.0.1 really just be fixes (the Android fixes specifically). > > Gary > > > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If an open issue has a fix version of the version being released it will >> automatically be updated to the next version. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Jul 18, 2014, at 9:57 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks! >> >> I'm using Jira at work but I don't think marking a version as released >> automatically modifies the fix version of outstanding issues (unless I'm >> missing something). >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 2014/07/19, at 1:45, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It should be now. I didn’t want to do that at the time because it would >> have moved everything to 2.0.1. You manually did the work so it should all >> be good now. >> >> Ralph >> >> On Jul 18, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Not a big deal, but in Jira, version 2.0 is still marked as not yet >> released. >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I finished the manual page on Custom Log Levels and Custom Loggers and >>> committed to trunk. >>> Please take a look. Feedback is welcome! >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Ralph Goers < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have added 2.0.1 to Jira. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 16, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Sounds good. I'll hold off on the Binary Logging >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-506>, Memory-Mapped >>>>> Appender <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-431> and config >>>>> improvements to replace system properties >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-321> that I would like >>>>> to see in a 2.1 release. >>>>> >>>>> I will try to finish the manual page for Custom/Extended Loggers >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-710> in time for the >>>>> 2.0.1 release. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph, can you create a 2.0.1 release in Jira (and mark 2.0 as >>>>> released)? Several issues were fixed after the 2.0 vote started that now >>>>> have 2.1 as their fix version. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Ralph Goers < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I agree. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we should take the approach that the next version will be a >>>>>> patch release, not a minor version and only change to a minor version if >>>>>> required. IOW, the current pom.xml files should all specify >>>>>> 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT >>>>>> as the version instead of 2.1-SNAPSHOT. This isn’t a big deal as it can >>>>>> be >>>>>> fixed during the release but it would be nice if the SNAPSHOT version >>>>>> always reflected what the next release is actually going to be. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ralph >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 16, 2014, at 8:14 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Now that 2.0 is done, I think it would be nice to see a 2.0.1 as soon >>>>>> as we resolve the last of the Android issue from the current batch. >>>>>> >>>>>> We can advertise 2.0.1 as the "Android" release which also include >>>>>> whatever tidbits (better status logger) have made it into trunk. >>>>>> >>>>>> I suggest this now while Ralph still has his RM hat on and we have a >>>>>> user that has been quite helpful on testing Android patches. And we are >>>>>> also all till in the releasing mindset and are paying attention. For 2.1, >>>>>> we can take a breath, and regroup. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>> >>>>>> Gary >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
