> On 2014/08/01, at 8:59, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> No, CachedClock wasn't changed.  
>> 
>> I suppose the test is too strict in that it may fail on slower systems or 
>> systems that are busy doing other things at the same time. 
>> 
>> I should just remove that test. Gary has mentioned it failing on his machine 
>> several times in the past, I think. It is unfortunately not easy to test 
>> Clocks otherwise, but this has been an annoyance for too long now. I'll get 
>> rid of it. 
>> 
>> Gary, with that in mind, can I ask you to reconsider your vote? 
> 
> That's the kinds of explanation I was looking for. thank you.
> 
> +1
Great, thank you!

(CC-ing Logging-PMC, that got dropped somewhere.)

> 
> Gary 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On 2014/08/01, at 8:06, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Wasn't the CachedClock stuff changed recently? Did that make it into this 
>>> release?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 31 July 2014 17:51, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> -0:
>>>> 
>>>> I downloaded the src zip and ran "mvn clean test" and got:
>>>> 
>>>> Failed tests:
>>>>   CachedClockTest.testAfterWaitStillLessThan17Millis:33 diff too large: 43
>>>> 
>>>> Tests run: 684, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 28
>>>> 
>>>> [INFO] 
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
>>>> [INFO]
>>>> [INFO] Apache Log4j 2 ..................................... SUCCESS [  
>>>> 3.427 s]
>>>> [INFO] Apache Log4j API ................................... SUCCESS [ 
>>>> 38.578 s]
>>>> [INFO] Apache Log4j Core .................................. FAILURE [06:41 
>>>> min]
>>>> 
>>>> Using:
>>>> 
>>>> Apache Maven 3.2.2 (45f7c06d68e745d05611f7fd14efb6594181933e; 
>>>> 2014-06-17T09:51:42-04:00)
>>>> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.2.2
>>>> Java version: 1.7.0_60, vendor: Oracle Corporation
>>>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_60\jre
>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>>> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>>> 
>>>> This seems like a test too strict or incorrect assumptions about clock 
>>>> granularity on Windows.
>>>> Worse, is that it does not happen every time I run Maven.
>>>> 
>>>> Ideally, I think all of the issues Remko found should be fixed and another 
>>>> RC cut, but they do not feel like "showstoppers", and I am not doing the 
>>>> RM work. Thank you Matt for doing the work.
>>>> 
>>>> The version thing is a bit confusing and I've rewritten this section of my 
>>>> email several times before settling on proposing to use the exact version 
>>>> number consistently: 2.0.1 for this release. Otherwise, talking about 
>>>> "Log4j" is fine, I do not think we need to talk about "Log4j 2" as a 
>>>> general rule. In the migration doc we can talk about "Log4j 1" and "Log4j 
>>>> 2" since context is important. But I can also see that some additional 
>>>> migration docs might only apply to later versions of Log4j where using a 
>>>> specific version will be important.
>>>> 
>>>> The perf module prints out screen after screen of warnings like:
>>>> 
>>>> [WARNING] 
>>>> /C:/temp/rc/apache-log4j-2.0.1-src/log4j-perf/target/generated-sources/annotations/org/apache/logging/log4j/perf/jmh/generated/FormatterLoggerBenchmark_latencyBaseline.java:[53,33]
>>>>  found raw type: org.openjdk.jmh.logic.results.Re
>>>> ult
>>>>   missing type arguments for generic class 
>>>> org.openjdk.jmh.logic.results.Result<T>
>>>> 
>>>> What is that all about?
>>>> 
>>>> Gary
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> +1 Artifacts look good, site looks good.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Minor issues found (no showstoppers IMO):
>>>>> 
>>>>> Artifacts
>>>>> ---------
>>>>> log4j-distribution-2.0.1-bin.zip/apache-log4j-2.0.1-bin/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>>>> "This is the first GA release, after thirteen prior releases over the 
>>>>> last 4 years.
>>>>> 
>>>>> ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Changes in this release..."
>>>>> 
>>>>> -> Should be "...the second GA release..."
>>>>> -> The question mark "?" should probably be "Bug fixes and enhancements"
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Site
>>>>> ----
>>>>> Download page: "Apache Log4j 2 is signed by Ralph Goers B3D8E1BA"
>>>>> -> Is this correct for 2.0.1?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Project Info > Dependency Convergence: logj2-perf uses disruptor-3.2.1, 
>>>>> but log4j-core uses disruptor-3.3.0.
>>>>> (Not an issue since log4j-perf is not a distribution artifact.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Javadoc: many package docs mention "Log4j 2.0". E.g.
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mattsicker/log4j/2.0.1/log4j-api/apidocs/index.html
>>>>> Sometime in the future we will release version 2.1, 2.2, etc.
>>>>> Should we update all Javadoc pages to "Log4j 2" to future-proof them?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Similarly, the FAQ page mentions "the Log4j 2.0 implementation" and "the 
>>>>> Log4j 2.0 API".
>>>>> We should probably change this to "the Log4j 2 implementation" and "the 
>>>>> Log4j 2 API".
>>>>> 
>>>>> Manual > Introduction (index.html)
>>>>> "The latest log4j version, including full-source code, class files and 
>>>>>  documentation can be found at 
>>>>> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.0/index.html.";
>>>>> -> We should change that link to 
>>>>> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/index.html
>>>>>    (It looks like 2.0 and 2.x both work as URLs.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Manual > Log4j 1.x Migration also has a few mentions of "2.0".
>>>>> Manual > Configuration page has one mention of "2.0".
>>>>> Manual > JMX has six places where log4j-api-2.0.jar etc are mentioned. 
>>>>>           -> Can we make these variables to they change with the 
>>>>> ${project.version}?
>>>>> Manual > Custom Log Levels has two places where log4j-core.2.0.jar is 
>>>>> mentioned.
>>>>>           -> Can we make these variables to they change with the 
>>>>> ${project.version}?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Manual > Layouts > PatternLayout, %d pattern examples:
>>>>> %d{HH:mm:ss}{GMT+0}       18:34:02,781 <- this does not look right? The 
>>>>> result has millis instead of timezone...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Manual > Architecture > LoggerConfig > Log Levels: (we may want to 
>>>>> rewrite the text below)
>>>>> The set of possible levels includes TRACE, DEBUG, INFO, WARN, ERROR, and 
>>>>> FATAL.
>>>>> Note that in Log4j 2, the Level is an Enum and cannot be sub-classed.
>>>>> Users who desire more granularity are encouraged to use Markers instead.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Manual > Extending Log4j > ContextSelector: missing 
>>>>> AsyncLoggerContextSelector
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.0.1, the first bug fix release of the 
>>>>>> 2.0 branch of Log4j 2.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please test and cast your votes.
>>>>>> [] +1, release the artifacts
>>>>>> [] -1, don't release because...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The vote will remain open for 72 hours (or more if required). Note that 
>>>>>> binding votes, as usual, are done by PMC members. Non-binding votes are 
>>>>>> welcome from anyone and are always welcome.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is my first time acting as an RM, so if there are any issues with 
>>>>>> this, please let me know as soon as possible! If you don't already have 
>>>>>> my GPG key, it's key ID FA1C814D which is available on all the public 
>>>>>> GPG servers. Otherwise, you can download it from my Apache site at: 
>>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/~mattsicker/FA1C814D.asc>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> New features:
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-725:  Added WebLoggerContextUtils class to log4j-web for helper 
>>>>>> methods useful for asynchronous servlets. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-710:  Added documentation for Custom Levels and Custom Loggers. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Fixed Bugs:
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-744:  Avoid unnecessary Clock calls when TimestampMessage is 
>>>>>> logged. Thanks to Scott Harrington. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-704:  Improved error message if configuration file not found. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-750:  Webapp configuration page has incorrect class name. 
>>>>>> Thanks to Mike Calmus. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-749:  Retain the default date pattern after fixing the ISO8601 
>>>>>> pattern. Thanks to Scott Harrington. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-670:  DatePatternConverter ISO8601_PATTERN now conforms to 
>>>>>> ISO8601. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-741:  Reinstate the package configuration attribute for 
>>>>>> discovering custom plugins. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-742:  XInclude not working with relative path. Thanks to Pascal 
>>>>>> Chollet. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-740:  Fixed typo in webapp manual regarding sample web.xml 
>>>>>> file. Thanks to Kosta Krauth. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-738:  RollingFileManager deadlock if async action thread fails 
>>>>>> to start. Thanks to Timothy Stack. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-736:  Fixed log4j-bom so that it won't specify a default scope 
>>>>>> on any third party dependencies. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-735:  Fixed log4j-bom so that it won't interfere with 
>>>>>> spring-bom and others. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-731:  Updated documentation regarding extensions to 
>>>>>> LoggerContextFactory and Log4j 2 providers. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-373:  Fixed ClassLoader issues in loading Log4j providers in an 
>>>>>> OSGi environment. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-719:  Correctly handle NetworkOnMainThreadException thrown on 
>>>>>> Android during Log4j2 initialization. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-716:  Automatically disable log4j JMX when detecting we are 
>>>>>> running on Android. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-657:  Fixed AbstractDatabaseManager to close connection on 
>>>>>> writeInternal error. Thanks to Stefan Wehner. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-713:  Android: java.lang.VerifyError: 
>>>>>> org/apache/logging/log4j/core/util/Closer Thanks to Nelson Melina. 
>>>>>> o LOG4J2-703:  Android: Could not find class 
>>>>>> 'javax.naming.InitialContext', referenced from method 
>>>>>> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.lookup.JndiLookup.lookup. Thanks to Nelson 
>>>>>> Melina. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Tag: 
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/log4j2/tags/log4j-2.0.1/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> SVN revision: 1614534
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Web Site: http://people.apache.org/~mattsicker/log4j/2.0.1/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Artifacts: 
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelogging-1005/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You may download all the artifacts by executing:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> wget -e robots=off --cut-dirs=3 -r -p -np --no-check-certificate 
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelogging-1005/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org 
>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>>>> Spring Batch in Action
>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org 
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
> Spring Batch in Action
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to