I can do the Nexus part now. I deleted the distribution directory. Should I also delete log4j-perf due to it being GPL'd?
On 4 August 2014 13:47, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > The order of publishing the artifacts doesn’t really matter much - except > you don’t really want the site going live until the artifacts are committed > to svn. I always do the Nexus release first. I believe you have > permission to do that. If not I am pretty sure I can do it even though you > created it. > > Ralph > > On Aug 4, 2014, at 11:43 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > The steps said not to do that until after it was committed to the other > svn repo. I don't have rights to do any of that. > > > On 4 August 2014 10:42, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Also, do you have rights to publish the site? I can publish the >> distribution artifacts when I get home tonight. I already have them when I >> verified the release. >> >> Ralph >> >> On Aug 4, 2014, at 7:30 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 Remko Popma >> +1 Gary Gregory >> +1 Ralph Goers >> >> +1 (non-binding) Bruno Mahe >> >> The release vote passed with +3 binding, +1 non-binding. The release >> artifacts are all on my site: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~mattsicker/log4j/ >> >> We need a PMC to commit these to svn. >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >> >> >> > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
