FYI, I've seen every other Apache project make their SVN location read-only after moving to GIT.
Cheers, Paul On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > If we switch to Git, we should make SVN read-only to avoid any confusion. > > Gary > > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +0.5 >> Not familiar enough with this to vote with more confidence. I'd vote +1 >> if we can use svn and Git in parallel. (Does Apache Git support svn >> extensions?) >> >> On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Scott Deboy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> On Aug 5, 2014 7:18 AM, "Matt Sicker" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> This topic was brought up elsewhere, so I'd like to propose a vote on >>>> switching to Git. >>>> >>>> +1 for me >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>> >>> > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >
