I'm fine with such occurrences getting fixed gradually over time, but I don't 
want to go in the other direction... 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 2015/09/02, at 9:32, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I see. Well,we do not seem to follow that style consistently :-( I see 105 
> static imports that are not *.
> 
> Gary
> 
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
>> C'mon, we agreed on this!
>> 
>> From our style guide:
>> No wildcard imports in the main tree
>> 
>> Wildcard imports, static or otherwise, are not used.
>> 
>> Static wildcard imports in the test tree
>> 
>> Wildcard static imports are encouraged for test imports like JUnit, 
>> EasyMock, and Hamcrest.
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On 2015/09/02, at 8:05, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Gross. If you have more than one * you have no idea where stuff comes from.
>>> 
>>> Gary
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> The explicit static imports is not an improvement.
>>>> 
>>>> I much prefer
>>>> import static org.junit.Assert.*;
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>> > On 2015/09/02, at 7:04, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > import static org.junit.Assert.*;
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] 
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>>> Spring Batch in Action
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] 
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
> Spring Batch in Action
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to