I deliberately chose that name to be consistent with the data source (System::nanoTime).
As to why System::nanoTime is apparently not consistent with System::currentTimeMillis, I suspect the Sun/Oracle engineers did this on purpose to avoid giving the impression that System::nanoTime had anything to do with wall-clock time. With that in mind I prefer the current method names. On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All: > > In org.apache.logging.log4j.core.LogEvent, we have two timestamp getters: > > - getNanoTime() (new 2.4) > - getTimeMillis() > > The naming is inconsistent, I propose to change getNanoTime() > to getTimeNanos(). > > Thoughts? > > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >
