I have separate Jira mailboxes for most of the projects I am involved in - although I don’t for Log4j for some reason. To be honest I don’t know which have a separate Jira email or not as I use a filter to route it to the appropriate mailbox (or delete it if I really don’t care). As such I really don’t care either way.
Ralph > On Oct 21, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote: > > I could use email filters, yes, but filters help categorize mail. I don't > want to categorize JIRA emails. I just don't want them. I think having a > different list is better to separate out ticket churn vs. discussion. Other > Apache projects have done this so I think it's beneficial here too. > > > Cheers, > Paul > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > The fewer lists the better IMO. That's what email client rules/filters are > for, no? > > Gary > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Paul Benedict <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Committers, > > I like subscribing to different mailing lists for JIRA notifications vs. > development discussions. Most Apache lists have an "issues" list dedicated to > ticket updates. That's not the case for LOG4J so it can get quite noisy when > JIRA heats up. > > What are your thoughts? Do you think we should split these two concerns into > separate lists? > > Cheers, > Paul > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com <http://garygregory.wordpress.com/> > Home: http://garygregory.com/ <http://garygregory.com/> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory <http://twitter.com/GaryGregory>
