I like "set" better, but that's just because I like to type "set" and use auto-complete. I'd rather not have to decide if I have to type "set" or "with" and then auto-complete.
Gary On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, but I introduced this problem a while ago by using withFoo() in > some builder classes, but setFoo() in other builder classes. Both are > equally valid naming schemes for builder classes. It would be great to be > consistent, though. Which one would be preferable? > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
