[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15159126#comment-15159126
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1297:
-------------------------------------
Why do loggers all need to be asynchronous? It isn't obvious to me why
synchronous loggers would have to create objects.
Why can't there be a Properties section?
I think the documentation for this should also call out what the impact is of
using the non-gc-free components. For example, using a PatternLayout that has a
lookup, using synchronous loggers or using properties.
> Document "gc-free" configuration and performance
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-1297
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1297
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 2.5
> Reporter: Remko Popma
> Assignee: Remko Popma
>
> Update the site with a description of which configurations are GC-free (i.e.,
> that don't create temporary objects in steady running state).
> Currently that means
> * Loggers are all asynchronous (Log4jContextSelector is set to
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.async.AsyncLoggerContextSelector)
> * the configuration does not contain a <Properties> section
> * the "steady-state" appenders are either RandomAccessFile or
> RollingRandomAccessFile Appenders (logging to any other appender will cause
> temporary objects to be created - including ConsoleAppender)
> * the Layout is a PatternLayout that uses one of the pre-defined date
> formats, does not have any regular expression replacements, and does not have
> lookups (TODO: may need to restrict this further)
> * in user code, when logging a parameterized message, the number of
> parameters is no more than ... (TBD pending discussion in LOG4J2-1278)
> * in user code, when logging a parameterized message, parameters of primitive
> type are boxed in a reused StringBuilder (Log4j provides a utility to make
> this relatively painless)
> Furthermore, we need to explain that some of this functionality depends on
> ThreadLocals and so is disabled by default in web applications to prevent
> memory leaks. The page should also explain how to manually switch off the use
> of ThreadLocals.
> Finally, the page should show a performance test comparison similar to the
> [performance
> section|http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/async.html#Performance] on
> the Async Loggers page. I'm thinking a comparison between Logback, Log4j-1,
> Log4j-2.0, Log4j-2.6 "classic" and Log4j-2.6 "gc-free" would be ideal.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
