They should be. You can always create a marker that acts as a collection of other markers, so there is no need to support a list in the LogEvent.
Ralph > On Apr 7, 2016, at 7:03 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Aren't hierarchical markers good enough for that? > > On 7 April 2016 at 00:02, Ralph Goers <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Didn’t we have this discussion several weeks ago? I don’t see a reason to > support it. > > Ralph > >> On Apr 6, 2016, at 9:51 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Before I go down some rabbit hole... >> >> Any thoughts on marking log events with more than one marker? >> >> Gary >> >> -- >> E-Mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com <http://garygregory.wordpress.com/> >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ <http://garygregory.com/> >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory <http://twitter.com/GaryGregory> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
