That sounds good. Do you have access to such an environment and time to run the 
tests in them?

Sent from my iPhone

> On 2016/05/16, at 17:42, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> It would be good if the tests on Linux and Windows in the Trade-offs sections 
> were made on the same hardware.
> 
>> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ok, thanks.
>> 
>>> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> I just did.
>>> 
>>> Ralph
>>> 
>>>> On May 14, 2016, at 4:05 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> OK. I am just about to check in the benchmarks and graphs for those two 
>>>> tests.  Please verify the benchmarks after I do.
>>>> 
>>>> Ralph
>>>> 
>>>>> On May 14, 2016, at 3:36 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sorry for the confusion. Don't worry:  I still need to create a JMH 
>>>>> benchmark for the filters, turn it into a nice graph and rewrite the last 
>>>>> paragraph. That part of the page isn't done yet. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I use Excel for the throughput graphs, HdrHistogram comes with a Google 
>>>>> chart thingy for the latency graphs. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2016/05/15, at 0:00, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What are you using to create the charts? I would still like to redo the 
>>>>>> filter comparison.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On May 14, 2016, at 6:30 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Still working on the performance page, but a draft of the new pages is 
>>>>>>> available here
>>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~rpopma/log4j/2.6/performance.html
>>>>>>> and here
>>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~rpopma/log4j/2.6/manual/garbagefree.html
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Feedback welcome!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Remko
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>  
> 
> Mikael Ståldal
> Senior software developer 
> 
> Magine TV
> [email protected]    
> Grev Turegatan 3  | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden  |   www.magine.com             
> 
> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. 
> If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not 
> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, 
> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  
>  

Reply via email to