Not being a Maven expert, a question: would this impact users in any way? If there's no downside then we should probably update.
On Thursday, 19 May 2016, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > We use a very old version 9 of the Apache Parent POM, where 18 is the > current version. > > It might be worth updating our reference and clean up for 2.6. > > 2c, > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','garydgreg...@gmail.com');> | ggreg...@apache.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ggreg...@apache.org');> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >
